We have been asking for a blued Python for quite some time now, and Colt has finally delivered. I was fortunate enough to have received an advanced copy from my friends at Colt. Since then, I’ve run about 150 rounds of various .357 Magnum and .38 Special through it. All was well. To be honest, being a Python, all was better than just ‘well.’

Aside from the finish, the blued Python is mechanically the same revolver as the stainless. However, the blued version does have one additional vent rib. The blued finish is quite attractive and a bit more understated.

Colt Python revolver chambered in .357 Magnum, left profile
Aside from the finish, the blued Python is mechanically the same revolver as the stainless. However, the blued version does have one additional vent rib.

The Python comes standard with exceptional target sights. The rear is adjustable for windage and elevation, and the front has a user-changeable insert. The orange insert naturally draws your eye, adding contrast to the front and rear sight.

The Colt Python is externally very similar to the original, with the stocks being interchangeable. However, some subtle changes bring this revolver up to date. Since 2020, the Python has been made from a more robust material, with 30% more material in the top strap. These updates have made this revolver stronger, more durable, and better able to handle the high-performance .357 Magnum, such as DoubleTap ammunition.

The original Python is a fine revolver. However, it had a reputation for being a little delicate, and a steady diet of magnum ammunition could get the revolver out of time. Finding a gunsmith with the skills to correctly retime a Python is daunting.

My test sample’s double-action trigger was just over eight pounds with no perceived stacking. The single-action trigger press broke under three pounds. Colt has reengineered the trigger mechanism using fewer parts and making those parts a bit more robust. This will add to the reliability of the revolver and give you a more consistent trigger pull from cylinder to cylinder.

Is this revolver worth the Python roll mark?

That is the question everyone has, and it seems there are some heated conflicts on that very idea. I have some experience with the older Pythons, and they are fine revolvers. However, with so many collectors hoarding them for so long, the price has inflated past what many folks can afford. I have wanted a shooter-grade Python for many years but could not justify the cost. If there was a problem, having to find a gunsmith who can work on it would have been an issue. I have shot ones that belonged to friends and decided to do without.

Colt Python 357 roll mark
Some have questioned whether the new generation of Pythons are worthy of the roll mark or just lower priced collector pieces. Yes, it is worthy!

Accuracy Results

Load

Group (inches)

Colt 110-grain DoubleTap .38 2.5
Winchester 150-grain LRN .38 2.75
Hornady 125-grain CD 2.25
DoubleTap 158-grain JHP 2

Colt did what made sense. It updated the Python and reintroduced it. With the improvements, you can buy a new Python that you will not feel guilty running a box of .357 Magnum ammunition through. Even though it has been redesigned, it is still a Python and performs as expected.

So, yes, it is worthy of the roll mark. The older Pythons were built on milling machines, and the parts had to be hand-fit; the principal machining was over because that was what the technology at that time dictated. The new Pythons are now manufactured on CNC machines, a more precise and consistent process. So, there is minimal hand fitting because technology has advanced. (i.e. you don’t need it.)

Python Specs

  • Barrel description: 1:14 LH, 6 Grooves
  • Barrel length: 4.25 inches
  • Finish: Blued
  • Frame material: Stainless steel
  • Grips: Walnut target stocks
  • Height: 5.5 inches
  • Overall length: 9.75 inches
  • Weight: 42 ounces
  • Width: 1.55 inches
  • Capacity: 6 rounds

Manufacturers take advantage of advances in metallurgy and machining processes at every opportunity. It would be foolish for Colt not to do the same.

hammer view of the Colt Python .357 Magnum revolver
My test sample’s double-action trigger was just over eight pounds with no perceived stacking. The single-action trigger press broke under three pounds.

If you have been pining for that Colt Python but could not justify the collector prices… Well, now is your chance to get your hands on one you can run hard and put up wet.

Have you been pining for a Colt Python but could not afford one? Does a blued shooter’s grade tickle your fancy? Share your review of the blued Python .357 Magnum in the Comment section.

Read the full article here

Share.

Comments are closed.